Chiang, M. Gerla and L. Xie, R. Talpade, T. McAuley and M. Xiao, A. Patil, Y. Liu, L. Ni and A. Google Scholar. Hass , J. Halpern and L. Biskupski ,J. Dowling and J. Lin , N. Shroff and R. Corson and S. ACM Computing surveys , vol.
Grossglauser and M. Gerla, C. Chiang and L. Ozaki, J. Kim and T. Michail and A. Sun Jung and N. Jetcheva and B. Chao Gui and P.
C Tang , S. And R. Long packets, such as the 1,byte packets we used, are a good way to stress a network. With long packets, the ratio between packet payload and packet headers is higher; therefore, it is easier to fill up a pipe with longer packets. While each of these packet lengths offers a useful way to describe device performance, there's no one-size-fits-all approach that indicates which device is best suited to enterprise use.
Every enterprise network carries a different distribution of packet lengths, and for best results it's necessary to develop a custom test traffic profile to test suitability for a given network. He can be reached at. Here are the latest Insider stories. More Insider Sign Out. Sign In Register.
Sign Out Sign In Register. Latest Insider. Check out the latest Insider stories here. More from the IDG Network. Breaking the standards. Aruba conquers challenge of Wi-Fi scalability.
0コメント